The de jour future novel right now is
dystopia. In started right back when with 1984, but it’s
magnified in the Hunger Games, The Resistance, The Spin, and so on. Nearly
every future imagined is something worse than we have now. Not only that, it’s something we have done. We had the civil wars; we ignored the needs of
the new generation; we used the environmental resources. And that seems to be the place fiction is
taking us – which I get. The world is
scary.
Yet I contrast all these futures to Star
Trek. Yep, I’m a trekkie. A died in the wool, Voyager is the best
series (don’t worry, I’ve heard it all) but I still love TNG and DS9
trekkie. (TOS I’m not really that into –but
I know all the relevant plot points).
The thing about Star Trek is it saw our – humanities – future as better.
That we can do better. That we, as
humanity, should do better. It
challenged stereotypes – interracial romance; female leadership. And it said we should all band together, and
we should all do better.
And today I watched Mr Selfridge. I really enjoyed it. But as I watched it, I felt it was in a way a
love letter to that time. To that
Britain, to that world. And it made a
point of how Mr Selfridge employed the women (well, until they got married),
and how it was a brave new world, music swelling. And I wonder, as much as I enjoyed it,
whether there is some inherent harm in glorifying the past like this. Yes, the story is great (I lived as a 12 year
old in the UK in 1994. Trust me when I
say I loved Selfridges.). But – should we
really be harking back to the past for what we romanticize? Why not romanticize
the future? Why not invest in making our
future not the dystopia? Let’s Star Trek
the hell out of ourselves.
Hear Hear!!
ReplyDelete